Re: [libreoffice-marketing] PC world article

PCWorld is and has always been very M$ friendly. Perhaps because M$ is a
huge sponsor (adverts).

We have the same situation with a few magazines here in our region.


Cheers,
Leif Lodahl
The Danish Team

2011/1/26 Charles-H. Schulz <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org>

> Hello,
>
> the coverage of LibreOffice 3.3 is generally good, and the span of the
> coverage (the number of written articles) is excellent.
>
> Anyone , any journalist is entitled to his/her own opinion, but this
> article is somewhat problematic. I usually read these articles and
> their comments carefully. They are often good sources to understand the
> "outside" perception of an OSS project or product. Yet I don't manage
> to find one point that is not sheer and free criticism of LibreOffice
> in this one.
>
> http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/217679/libreoffice_33_handson_with_the_free_office_suite.html
> My question might be naive so bear on with me: how can we avoid this
> amount of crap ? "it's really only good for Open Source Developers but
> not in real life" That's not journalism that's prejudice. "I miss
> SharePoint"..WTF?
>
> Your comments are welcome (note: I might have taken the issue in a
> completely wrong way).
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Charles-H. Schulz
> Membre du Comité exécutif
> The Document Foundation.
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
> marketing+help@libreoffice.org<marketing%2Bhelp@libreoffice.org>
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/marketing/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***