On 11/20/2010 09:04 PM, drew wrote:
So of course the wiki is a tool that is going be used, but the process
of design, as is ongoing here, and then implementation via a CMS, such
as Drupal or Silverstripe for that matter, is precisely a mechanism for
delivery of a system that performs in the way you describe, IMO.
I do not mind about the platform. I know that when the information is on
the web site it is considered official, while the same information on a
wiki is not official (I can ask the press to amend a statement taken
from the wiki, but I cannot ask to amend a statement taken from the web
site). I assume that information visible on the web site are officially
approved documents, while you can easily write on a wiki page that "this
is work in progress, and should not be considered officially approved".
I do not mind what happens before the publication on the web site. I am
not concerned of what happens behind the scenes, also because I am not a
tech guy and most of the times I do not understand technology.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.