Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On 11/20/2010 09:04 PM, drew wrote:

So of course the wiki is a tool that is going be used, but the process
of design, as is ongoing here, and then implementation via a CMS, such
as Drupal or Silverstripe for that matter, is precisely a mechanism for
delivery of a system that performs in the way you describe, IMO.

I do not mind about the platform. I know that when the information is on the web site it is considered official, while the same information on a wiki is not official (I can ask the press to amend a statement taken from the wiki, but I cannot ask to amend a statement taken from the web site). I assume that information visible on the web site are officially approved documents, while you can easily write on a wiki page that "this is work in progress, and should not be considered officially approved".

I do not mind what happens before the publication on the web site. I am not concerned of what happens behind the scenes, also because I am not a tech guy and most of the times I do not understand technology.

Italo Vignoli - The Document Foundation
Mobile +39.348.5653829 - VoIP: +39.02.320621813
Skype: italovignoli - GTalk:

E-mail to for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.