Hi, :-)
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:19, Marc Paré <marc@marcpare.com> wrote:
Le 2010-11-12 22:04, Michael Wheatland a écrit :
Why re-invent the wheel?
- David
Because google has announced it will be removing the wheel before the
end of next year.
Google has also open sourced the blueprints for the wheel and made it
very easy to construct your own wheel.
http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/jalopnik/2009/03/Missing_Wheel.jpg
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/08/update-on-google-wave.html
Many people found Wave too confusing and the learning curve was still to
steep for regular users. I belong to groups who tried and it was abandoned.
I think Wave was trying to be too much of a cooperative "Swiss army knife"
and forgot that people want simplicity.
Google Wave was just a possibility mentioned; I'm not even sure if it
would be a popular choice. It's a great tool, but involves a bit of a
learning curve for many people. The public Wave service was
discontinued earlier this year, IIRC. But it is still offered as a
Labs product in Google Apps (I'm talking about Google Apps for domains
and organizations).
However, whether or not Wave lives on, I feel that Google Apps has a
number of other extremely useful tools that TDF/LibO could use, and it
was more those wheels I was suggesting that we don't re-invent. :-)
David Nelson
--
E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.