Hi all,
in the today's marketing conference call (Agenda at [1]), some people
mentioned that the number of mails and the diversity of topics is a bit
too much for a single mailing list like marketing.
So my (unofficial) question is, whether you think that another
communication channel (mailing list, in the first step) might help.
What do you think?
Personally, I think that the combination of topics like "artwork",
"usability", "branding", "visual design", ... would make sense. On the
one hand, it prevents coming up with far too many lists", on the other
hand, it might engage collaboration of those, who hadn't the chance to
work together (in the past).
An additional rationale is that there are already some other people
ready to join - a separate mailing list would make it more easy for them
to follow the topics.
Cheers,
Christoph
PS: "Unofficial question" (see above) means, that I am interested in
what you think about that. Once we are clear what to do, we might ask
the SC to set this up ... but not if we consider this unhelpful.
[1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/ConfCalls#Agenda
--
E-mail to marketing+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/marketing/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-marketing] Do we need a separate mailing list for artwork/usability/branding...? · Christoph Noack
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.