Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Really 2,609 new strings?

Christian Lohmaier kirjoitti 10.6.2026 16:36:
> Hi Tuomas, *,
>
> On Wed, Jun 10, 2026 at 3:25 PM Tuomas Hietala <tuomas.hietala@iki.fi> 
> wrote:
> > Also, searching for "SC_OPCODE" in Weblate was a good way to find all
> > the the function-related strings. I think searching for "oc" will
> > produce lots of false positives.
>
> Nah, that's pretty much the same. Search for  context:r"^oc" i.e.
> context starting with oc and assuming you're only searching in
> sc/messages it is the same thing really. You can also filter for
> location:sc/inc/scfuncs.hrc where those strings come from.

Okay, I'll try that.

> > Is the benefit of this change on the development side proportional to
> > the drawbacks on the translation side?
>
> Better maintainable code/better structured code.. And if the searching
> for strings was the only drawback (except being jumpscared by 2000 new
> strings) - for that I don't see the problem, you can search for
> location or the new prefix instead.

Fine, let's go ahead then. Although I'll note that these kind of bulk 
changes also erase translation history in Weblate as side effect. Maybe 
most translators won't object to that - but I think many developers 
would if the same happened to the code they've written.

> ciao
> Christian

Tuomas

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy