Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Really 2,609 new strings?

Also, searching for "SC_OPCODE" in Weblate was a good way to find all 
the the function-related strings. I think searching for "oc" will 
produce lots of false positives.

Is the benefit of this change on the development side proportional to 
the drawbacks on the translation side?

Tuomas

Neil Roberts kirjoitti 9.6.2026 21:23:
> It looks like the patch below has changed the context of a whole bunch
> of strings so Weblate thinks they are new:
>
> https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/114bc67a2d2f1b9f84f68a3f3d1a93077ef4e369%5E!
>
> Yikes!
>
> Hopefully there’s a way to get the old translations back.
>
> – Neil
>
> Michael Wolf <milupo@sorbzilla.de> writes:
>
> > I've just seen on Weblate that there are 2,609 (!) new strings. Is 
> > that
> > really true? There wasn't any information in this mailgroup yet.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
> > Problems? 
> > https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> > Posting guidelines + more: 
> > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> > List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
> > Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy