Re: [libreoffice-l10n] many fuzzy strings due to xlm tags move in 5.2 help files

Il 19 marzo 2016 19:02:07 CET, Martin Srebotnjak <miles@filmsi.net> ha scritto:
> It's an old story. Developers of OOo/LO think localizers are enjoying
> this
> kind of manual work. As if it was a mandala or knitting.
> So they rework tags every now and then, without caring about our
> feelings.
>
> But we are not enjoying it and the latest thousands changes of the tag
> kind
> must be made with a script in the translated strings. Not our work.
>
> So we have enough time to do what we do - localize. Amen.
>
> Lp, m.
>
> 2016-03-19 18:13 GMT+01:00 Stanislav Horáček
> <stanislav.horacek@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Dne 14.3.2016 v 18:35 Christian Lohmaier napsal(a):
> >
> > > Hi *,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Sophie <gautier.sophie@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > + Many strings are the same content but with xml tags placed
> differently
> > > >
> > >
> > > Most fuzzy strings are not because xml tags being placed differently
> > > (where xml tags are different,  it was to fix validation errors),
> but
> > > most fuzzy strings are due to changes in message context.
> >
> > there are also hundreds of the strings with differently placed tags
> and
> > for them it is not enough to just accept fuzzy strings - typically
> > <swichinline><caseinline><emph></emph></caseinline></swichinline> has
> been
> > changed to
> <emph><swichinline><caseinline></caseinline><swichinline></emph>.
> > Are these strings planned to be translated automatically as well?
> >
> >
> > > But as it is time til August, not urgent (doesn't need to be done
> this
> > > or next week IMHO). Remember: if we wouldn't have master projects,
> you
> > > wouldn't know about this right now :-))
> >
> > This is not completely true - the issue with the "l10n" and "oldref"
> tags
> > changing context affected also 5.1 strings, now it is just
> highlighted
> > because of the massive automated changes.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Stanislav
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
> > Problems?
> > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> > Posting guidelines + more:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
> > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot
> be
> > deleted
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
> Problems?
> http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
> All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
> deleted

Hi All

I definitely agree with Martin. :)

Ciao
Valter
-- 
Open Source is better!
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted