Re: [libreoffice-l10n] New Pootle Invalid XML

Den 01.06.2015 13:12, Andras Timar skreiv:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Kolbjørn Stuestøl
> <kolbjoern@stuestoel.no> wrote:
> > It looks like the error function are reading < and > as XML tags.
> > The text "… new style of footnotes with <ref> and <references> tags that …"
> > is marked correctly as Invalid XML. (Unit #31209006). But they are not meant
> > to be XML tags. Here they are plain text.
> > Is it desirable to use &lt; and &gt; (or similar codes) instead of < and >
> > to avoid the error message?
> IMHO it's easier to mark it as false positive in Pootle. There are
> only a few of them in case of 'Invalid XML' check. Every string change
> causes 100x work for 100x languages, not to mention engineer's time.
>
> Regards,
> Andras
You are right. I thought that &lt; and &gt; perhaps is a valid code for 
< and > as in HTML.
Of course, there are more important tasks than this one.
(Sent copy to list too)
Kolbjoern


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted