On 11/30/2014 11:23 AM, Rimas Kudelis wrote:
2014.11.30 07:38, Yury Tarasievich rašė:
...
And if you use Windows and want to make inputting these characters even
more convenient, you can always customize your keyboard layout adding
missing typographical symbols to the AltGr (or any other) layer. Here's
a free tool to do that:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/goglobal/bb964665.aspx.
Well, as Adolfo tells us, it's "bah" to Windows
users". However, Linux's en_US keymap (which I'm
using right now) also does not have any of
mentioned glyphs on the compose key.
I'm heavily using several fancy glyphs input
add-ons in LO itself, and I tell you, it's not
all fun.
Program UI isn't a typography showcase. Why not leave the pragmatic
simplification which serves it purpose? Does it break anything?
I agree this will be annoying, because at the very least, the localizers
will have to re-approve a lot of their old translations when these
changes land. At least in the case of "don't" though, maybe this change
could be automated, if we ask Andras or Christian nicely? :)
I can guess with some confidence that having to
redo apostrophes in, like, thousand strings by
hand (and you can't automate, apostrophe's use
in technology being what it is) just to have
"correct" characters in the UI feels more like a
slap in a face.
What's strictly "incorrect" in straight
apostrophe, anyway?
Is any REAL purpose actually served by this
change? Like, will anybody notice this or
appreciate this or-so-nice touch in the computer
screen material?
Will this conceal the fact that LibreO/ApacheOO
itself isn't that great in typography in the
documents it produces?
Yury
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't (continued)
[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't · Martin Srebotnjak
[libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't · Yury Tarasievich
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't · Rimas Kudelis
- [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Re: [libreoffice-l10n] n’t → n't · Yury Tarasievich
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.