Hi Tom, Thomas, *
Le 13/10/2013 12:54, Tom Davies a écrit :
Hi :) I tend to dislike "must not" too. It's soo authoritarian that
it makes me want to go against it or to find out why not by
experimentation. I prefer things like; should avoid try not to
please don't it's worth avoiding ... because ... and other such less
definite equivalents. Even better is if you can flip it around to
say the positive instead.
The reasons I used "must not" are simple:
- makes the reader aware that this is of the most importance: if he
breaks the build, his language can't be built or in other cases, the
users of his language will lose data,
- makes it clear for readers who are not confident with English: 'must'
has no ambiguity, this is not the case for 'should' or 'have to'. With
'must', there is no question even if your English is not so good.
Kind regards
Sophie
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: l10n+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/l10n/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Questions and annotations to guide 2 (continued)
Re: [libreoffice-l10n] Documentation for l10n · Leo Moons
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.