Le 11/04/18 à 10:49, Kaganski Mike a écrit :
On 4/11/2018 10:46 AM, Jean-Pierre Ledure wrote:
When the database conversion is automatic without a fault back
scenario, then the software has at least to *GUARANTEE* that there
will be neither data loss nor functional loss afterwards.
Well - the "*GUARANTEE*" part sounds ... funny even comparing with "guarantee" level offered by
paid support from some industry-leading
corporations);
OK, I'm ready to make a compromise here: avoidance of data loss should
be guaranteed while functional regressions should be kept minimal ...
but there's a point: I don't know how is it implemented
now, but I see how a user might be concerned when one opens one's DB
with a newer SW and gets a converted data without warnings or backups.
So we should actually provide either one or the other. Id doesn't matter
if one wants "guarantees"; but it does if one gets unexpected
incompatibilities - e.g., one may work with one's data using different
software on different occasions, etc.
That's why I insist on a mastered process: the user should decide how
and when he wants to migrate his Base files.
Thanks for your comments.
JPL
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.