Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 01/11/16 19:19, Jan Iversen wrote:


Piling in really late, I know, but forcing people to use a licence
they're not keen on isn't really a good idea.

Just a fast input, during the last year where I have been keeping an eye on licenses, we have not 
had a single real problem. 

We have had a couple of people needing clarification, and a couple (I only remember one) who did 
not want to use his name.

So why change a working system and create potential confusion.

Because giving orders to volunteers isn't actually a very good idea?

Sorry, but I'm probably not unique in getting upset when told to do
something "just because". Trying to meet others half-way is always a
good idea.

Cheers,
Wol


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.