Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index



Signed PGP part
Hi Jan,

why cannot Björn's contributions be licensed under CC-0 or under Public
Domain? Doug - for example - chose WTFL... Technically this is possible!

It's the same if somebody wants to use APLv2. It is compatible with our
license and it totally valid.

Not again, sorry.

Look at:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers#Example_Statement 
<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers#Example_Statement>

that is the current rulebook, for development exclusively use MPLv2/LGPLv3+ dual license

The ESC can change that rule, but until then, that is how we work with our development repos.

Other types of work is less my concern, but there is an ongoing discussion about how documentation 
should be licensed.

rgds
jan I.


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.