Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:05 AM, David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com> wrote:
IMHO there are just two alternatives: Either the code is "ours", in
which case it should be an optional component and should only be updated
together with libreoffice. Or it is external, in which case the sources
should not be duplicated in our repo, but the project should be treated
as another one of the dozen extensions we allow to bundle. That means,
download the .oxt during build, unpack it, put it to instdir and be done
with it. (This is directly supported by gbuild, using
gb_ExtensionPackageSet).

FWIW, after reading this thread, I concurs with the above.
The current expressed 'problem' seems a self inflicted wound, due to
wanting to become 'a core part of Libreoffice' while not wanting to
follow the consequences associated with that status.


Norbert

---
Tu ne peux pas avoir le beurre, l'argent du beurre (et la cremiere)

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.