On 04/23/2013 12:46 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> wrote:
well... all of the abstractions in gbuild don't help much for external
libraries.
But in that case the said library did not have to be external at all.
one cannot have it both ways: create a 'somewhat' independent project,
managed completely outside of LibreOffice infrastructure, including
ACLs, source code management, etc..
and expect magical seamless integration. not to mention that
build-expert would be hard press to fix anything, short of doing a
'patch' dance in our own build system...
we have to do that for real external library.. but these dep do not
change very often... but for moving target like orcus and other of
kohei's babies.... that is really not attractive.
Can we please stop this thread?
It was all my fault.  Sorry about everything.  There is nothing wrong 
with gbuild. Let's make that clear.
Peace,
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
Context
  Re: Master branch now requires liborcus 0.5.0 or higher. · Norbert Thiebaud
- Re: Master branch now requires liborcus 0.5.0 or higher. · Kohei Yoshida
 
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.