Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:34:31AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
I don't understand why one would want to use the term "class" in the
gbuild context. Isn't that just misleading?

Look at:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Class_%28computer_programming%29
 "Classes are composed from structural and behavioral constituents."

which is _exactly_ what gbuild does in the best way supportable in make.
GObject also uses this vocabulary in a non-OOP language and if it wouldnt, it
would be even harder to grok the concepts. ;)

Best,

Bjoern

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.