On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@suse.com> wrote:
You might also find that in fact it is faster to have everything in one
blob - ie. the whole suite there, and that LTO and PGO will give a
better result for that; certainly for some use-cases such as LibreOffice
on-line having a single very large, fully internally resolved library
would be rather more memory efficient for lots of connecting clients I
suspect, faster to get running etc. So it is by no means wasted work -
are you interested in creating an mode for --enable-merge-libs=all (or
sim.) that does that ?
And did you get any further with the debugging ?
Ok, I'll take a look at adding a mergelibs=all option.
I decided that it would probly be easier to just start over
rather than trying to debug the errors I was getting.
Thanks,
Peter
Context
- Re: plans with libmerged (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.