Hi,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (04-03-13 23:58)
[new template dialog problems in 4.0.0]
thx for the look into that - as a first question (Cc QA list), is this
list triaged enough for hackers to start poking at high-prio issues?
I did quite some checking, rephrasing, and closing of dups. And 
discussed when needed in the comments.
Did not take a close look at all prio's set.
Also I have few minor issues here, that I did not yet file.
And there are some issues related, in the sense that they are about 
missing functionality that was in the old dialog. But I guess any hacker 
looking at it will quickly link them.
So far for what I looked at it. I had a (global) discussion with two 
contributors (qa/hacking) last Saturday too, that does not lead to 
different view.
Still, I'm open for what others find of course, but the short answer 
should be 'Yes' ;)
Cheers,
--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org
 - www.librelex.org
Context
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.