Hi,
Thorsten Behrens wrote (04-03-13 23:58)
[new template dialog problems in 4.0.0]
thx for the look into that - as a first question (Cc QA list), is this
list triaged enough for hackers to start poking at high-prio issues?
I did quite some checking, rephrasing, and closing of dups. And
discussed when needed in the comments.
Did not take a close look at all prio's set.
Also I have few minor issues here, that I did not yet file.
And there are some issues related, in the sense that they are about
missing functionality that was in the old dialog. But I guess any hacker
looking at it will quickly link them.
So far for what I looked at it. I had a (global) discussion with two
contributors (qa/hacking) last Saturday too, that does not lead to
different view.
Still, I'm open for what others find of course, but the short answer
should be 'Yes' ;)
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
- www.librelex.org
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.