On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 11:47:01AM +0000, tino wrote:
We should not implement them in rtl/math.hxx until there are more users
than calc's interpreter that need it. Lets not overcomplicate this stuff
as long as it is not necessary.
What about implementation in random.cxx and creating random.hxx so all
the random stuff is in one place?
Why do you want this abstraction? Following KISS I would just start
implementing the functions in ScInterpreter and extract commonly used
parts into an own method. If at some point other parts of Libreoffice
also need random functions with known statistical properties we can
still extract them.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.