On 30/11/12 17:07, tino wrote:
I've had a look at what Gnumeric offers, and they've done a big job on
random number generation. Comparing with what is available in boost
I've separated the list into rand functions which could be quickly
implemented using boost and those which can't (and would require more
intelligence to implement). Another problem might be that boost 1.44
which is currently used in libreoffice has even fewer distribution
functions implemented.
if newer versions of boost have desirable features then upgrading that
is always an option, but that needs a lot of testing because of the wide
variety of different compilers and versions thereof that are currently
supposed to be able to build LO, and boosts tendency to use every
obscure C++ feature...
If there's interest, I'd be happy to work on a patch to implement the
first half of the functions into
core/sal/rtl/source/math.cxx
or maybe random.cxx? However, random.* seems not that well
maintained as there's no random.hxx.
the header is sal/inc/rtl/random.h (which is apparently a C interface).
but why do we need a wrapper around boost in sal? i mean i haven't
looked at the boost random stuff but unless its interface is horrible
(always a possibility with boost i guess) _and_ there are multiple
places where we'd want to call it, then why not use it directly from
Calc's formula implementation?
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.