Re: bundled saxon considered harmful

Caolán McNamara <caolanm -AT- redhat.com>
Thu, 04 Oct 2012 12:10:41 +0100

On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 03:58 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:

Why? if that become truly an extension, it can be on whatever license
no ? so just leave it as LGPL3...


To make it future-proof against wheel of reincarnation if saxon licence
changes again and/or something comes along and we want to fold back in
again some day.

C.

Context

bundled saxon considered harmful · David Tardon
- Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · Norbert Thiebaud
  - Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · Caolán McNamara
- Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · Michael Meeks
  - Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · Caolán McNamara
  - Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · David Tardon
    - Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · d . ostrovsky
      - Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · Norbert Thiebaud
        
        Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · d . ostrovsky
        
        Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · David Tardon
        
        Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · d . ostrovsky
        Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · Michael Meeks
- Re: bundled saxon considered harmful · Peter Jentsch

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.