Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 3:40 AM, David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi all,

2. a repo on github or similar
PROS:
* distance from libreoffice. It is not part of our project, so we are not
  obliged in any way to ship it :-)
CONS:
* no automatic commit rights (but who would want to commit to the
  project anyway? :-)

This also needs license cleanup first, as the related files are still
under the old LGPL3 license.

Why? if that become truly an extension, it can be on whatever license
no ? so just leave it as LGPL3...

Note: I already have setup a mirror of our repos on gitosis, if that help.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.