Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 06:41:50PM +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
Hi David,

2012/8/7 David Tardon <dtardon@redhat.com>

Hi all,

this is just an announce that I have converted dictionaries to gbuild on
branch feature/gbuild_dictionaries. I am not looking for testers this
time, because there is no platform-dependent stuff there :-) I am just
going to run a couple more rebuilds to ensure there are no missing deps
and then push it into master.

When testing the conversion--I wrote a script to compare the old and new
content of all the dictionaries--I have identified several files that
have not been packed into the extensions previously and I wonder if
perhaps they should be. Anyone has any opinion? The list is here:


I think they were left out by mistake. On the other hand I wonder if we
could omit multiple instances GPL/LGPL text from bundled dictionary
packages, while we have a central LICENSE.odt covering for the
dictionaries, too.

Do you mean we should put in the standard LICENSE text like the "normal"
extensions do? Or not even that?

D.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.