On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 18:41 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
I think they were left out by mistake. On the other hand I wonder if
we could omit multiple instances GPL/LGPL text from bundled dictionary
packages, while we have a central LICENSE.odt covering for the
dictionaries, too.
Yep - if that is the only content; it'd be good to reduce the weight of
duplication of the same license for bundled bits.
Thanks :-)
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.