IMHO the decision to render just squares prolly complicates the
situation un-necessarily.
Sure, but on the other hand it makes it simpler in that we don't need
to figure out the aspect ratio of each page (they can be different)
beforehand.
BTW, I didn't mention in the IDL, but I did think that the not only
would it be a square, but also the side of the square would be a
power-of-two. Presumably you also want power-of-two for each side?
Consider an A4 document - 2 x sqrt(2) in
dimensions - almost certainly we end up with some 21x17 type ratio and
then have to work hard to try to pack squares into it.
Hmm, but isn't this then an argument *in favour* of keeping the
rendered area square (and with a power-of-two side)? (Note that this
would mean that when zoomed in at some level and beyond, some tiles
will be completely outside of the page area.)
--tml
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.