On Tuesday 20 of March 2012, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 15:20 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Before I start experimenting with more stuff in OUString that might look
a bit like operator+= , what exactly is so irritating about operator= or
operator+= in OUString and why?
It's just that if OUString was supposed to be immutable,
That is the theory, but what does it matter in practice? The only result of
this that I can see is that it leads to cumbersome
string->stringbuffer->string back and forths, so I wonder what the actual
benefit of it is supposed to be? The way I see it it would be much better to
just go with the string class and improve it as necessary, the buffer should
be either deprecated or left for cases where the modifications are extensive.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lunak@suse.cz
Context
- Re: About Strings (continued)
Re: About Strings · Olivier Hallot
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.