On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 15:20 +0100, Lubos Lunak wrote:
On Tuesday 20 of March 2012, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 13:39 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
(And even if immutable classes are
generally also a good idea in C++, esp. in combination with
multi-threading, the mutable rtl::OUString::operator= spoils this,
anyway.)
And the += operator irritates me.
Before I start experimenting with more stuff in OUString that might look a
bit like operator+= , what exactly is so irritating about operator= or
operator+= in OUString and why?
It's just that if OUString was supposed to be immutable, then a
foo += bar; "feels wrong" to me in some vague way that, I guess
bizarrely, foo = foo + bar doesn't. *shrug*
C.
Context
- Re: About Strings (continued)
Re: About Strings · Olivier Hallot
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.