On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 13:39 +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
(And even if immutable classes are
generally also a good idea in C++, esp. in combination with
multi-threading, the mutable rtl::OUString::operator= spoils this, anyway.)
And the += operator irritates me.
Either way though, its a nonsense to have 4 (well three now, ByteString
is gone) string classes. And given that the rtl::O[U]String classes are
the ones that are available for external api users its only fair that we
use *that* one and not run back to the "classic" non-exported UniString
when rtl::OUString is too hard to use for something
C.
Context
- Re: About Strings (continued)
Re: About Strings · Olivier Hallot
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.