Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index




On 2012-02-14 14:22, Michael Meeks wrote:
Perhaps; could it also be that we like to compile with gcc in some eight way parallel way, but when it comes to linking, we -really- don't want to bog our machine down in that way ? I wonder if we could explicitly limit parallelism of linking in some way (?) - we should prolly also do this for the java compilation which is often quite memory intensive and doesn't do well with umpteen in parallel (at least on my machine).

Java compilation would be a hang of a lot faster if the build process passed all of the java files to the compiler in one go. Java is really not meant to be compiled in a file-at-a-time-model, it is meant to be compiled in a single-project-at-a-time go.

Regards, Noel Grandin


Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.