Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Tor,

On Monday, 2012-02-13 13:31:11 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:

Do we really need to keep "analysis" and "date" as separate shared
libraries? Would it be OK to move their source code over to the "sc"
module, and merge their objects into the "sc" library, and their
.component files into sc.component?

Actually I'm glad that these are not lumped together under sc. They also
serve as an entry point for people who want to develop their own set of
UNO Add-In functions. If this is for the mere library count limited on
Android I'd prefer if there was a mechanism that allowed to link those
objects in only on that platform.

Probably the code that refers to them could be simplified a bit then,
too, but that I don't know how to do.

I don't see easy simplification there even if we merged them.

  Eike

-- 
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD

Attachment: pgpiYRiwPBSEX.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.