OK to get rid of scaddins?

Tor Lillqvist <tml -AT- iki.fi>
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:31:11 +0200

Do we really need to keep "analysis" and "date" as separate shared
libraries? Would it be OK to move their source code over to the "sc"
module, and merge their objects into the "sc" library, and their
.component files into sc.component?

Probably the code that refers to them could be simplified a bit then,
too, but that I don't know how to do.

--tml

Context

OK to get rid of scaddins? · Tor Lillqvist
- Re: OK to get rid of scaddins? · Michael Stahl
  - Re: OK to get rid of scaddins? · Tor Lillqvist
  - Re: OK to get rid of scaddins? · Michael Meeks
    - Re: OK to get rid of scaddins? · Michael Stahl
      - Re: OK to get rid of scaddins? · Michael Meeks
        
        Re: OK to get rid of scaddins? · Mark Wielaard
        
        linking performance (was: Re: OK to get rid of scaddins?) · Michael Stahl
        
        Re: linking performance (was: Re: OK to get rid of scaddins?) · Michael Meeks
        
        faster java compilation (was Re: linking performance (was: Re: OK to get rid of scaddins?)) · Noel Grandin
        Re: faster java compilation (was Re: linking performance · Michael Stahl

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.