Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 19/10/11 16:32, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 10/19/2011 05:07 PM, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 16:34 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
(the number is not always 72) that is repeated more or less identically
some 12,000 times in the 7 minute run. Since each set appears to take
around .02 seconds that alone would account for some 4 minutes of
the run.

7321 times reading out /proc/self/map -- no idea why it does that, but
that clearly ain't no good...

Yep :-) If I remember rightly - the only moving part in this
side-to-side performance comparison that causes a substantial decrease
in performance is Java 7 vs 6 right ? The strace shows it poking
at /proc/self/map endlessly (something that is not done by any
LibreOffice code I can find off hand), which perhaps helps isolate the
problem rather better ?

What the LibO hsqldb code does a lot is call JNI's
Attach/DetachCurrentThread. Googling around,
<http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6929067> "Stack
guard pages should be removed when thread is detached" suggests that
reading /proc/self/maps might have been added into
Attach/DetachCurrentThread as part of a bug fix. That would explain things.

Or maybe it is to do with "Add code to unmap stack guard area when thread is detached." in the evaluation of that bug. In the trace the end of read, close(), is always followed by munmap.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.