Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


At 6:28am -0400 Thu, 06 Oct 2011, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
2011/10/6 Norbert Thiebaud:
I'll give it a shot...

Not that I expect it to make a big difference... since most of the
compiles are ccached...

As an nth data point on the matter, I've been using ccache for awhile, and my builds take longer. Anecdotally (because I'm not focused on ccache specifically), I turned it off the other day, and my builds reduced from about 2 hours to 1h15m.* For reference, my ccache size is 8G, but only 1.8 G has been used. My hits at about 12,000 are about half of my misses.

Cheers,

Kevin

* Both of those numbers are _very_ rough averages (created from memory of my "alias make='time make'" output), my builds compile in the background, at nice +19, on a puny dual-core 4G machine with a latent rotating HDD. The majority of my builds are "./g pull -r; make" used for testing. The less rough average is the "make distclean; ./g pull -r; make" workflow, which reduced a 3h30m compile to about 2h05m on the same hardware.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.