Re: [Libreoffice] oox/source/drawingml/customshapepresets.cxx is just (Offensive Word Found In Message) too much for gcc

2011/10/6 Radek Doulík <rodo@novell.com>:
> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 04:13 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > > One thing I noticed. It might be useful to run tinderboxes without gcc
> > > optimization (ie. with -O0). It makes huge difference in compile time -
> > > more than 10 times faster on my system and could make the tinderbox
> > > turnaround much faster.
> >
> > Yes, but the generated daily build would be less usefull that way and
> > possibly hide optimisation-induced bug until the last minute.
>
> I thought the point of tinderboxes was to check quickly whether the tree
> is buildable and report failure if not. I would consider differences
> between whether an optimized or a non-optimized compilation would
> complete to be compiler bug and ignore these. IMO, I would prefer
> quicker turnarounds. Even more when the turnaround can be in order of 10
> hours.
>
> OTOH, we would need first to see how much would -O0 save for the whole
> build.

I'll give it a shot...

Norbert