Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] [PUSHED] .: stoc/source

At 2:58am -0400 Wed, 05 Oct 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 11:01 PM, Kevin Hunter wrote:
> > Here is a second patch that compiles, /should/ respond to what you just
> > confirmed was the original intent, but is untested. (It was a random
> > drive by patching.) Specifically, I suppose it's obvious that this now
> > changes the semantics of it actually used to do. If you know how to test
> > it ...
>
> Yes, that's how I would have done it, too. Pushed now, thanks again.
> (I assume you already stated somewhere what license your
> contributions are under, even though that's not explicitly listed at
> <http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers>.)

Heh, yeah, awhile ago.  Had a whole discussion with the Meeks.  :-)

http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2010-October/001178.html

In short: LGPLv3.

I should update that list, but I figure I'm yet a minor contributor, etc.

Cheers,

Kevin