Re: [Libreoffice] subsequenttest hang ...

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Stephan Bergmann <sbergman@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/26/2011 11:23 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
> > So... my Linux tinderbox hanged again in make check... after only 3
> > green iterations... I have not noticed for 7 hours, nor anyone else
> > apparently...
>
> Would that be
> <http://tinderbox.libreoffice.org/cgi-bin/gunzip.cgi?tree=MASTER&full-log=1317053012.10270>?
>  Unfortunately, there is no information about the hanging build left, so it
> is impossible to tell what the problem was here.

here the tail of the make check log.
LOG> Log started 26.08.2011 - 11:34:33
checking: [forms.OEditModel::com::sun::star::beans::XMultiPropertySet]
is iface: [com.sun.star.beans.XMultiPropertySet] testcode:
[ifc.beans._XMultiPropertySet]
LOG> Execute: getPropertySetInfo()
Method getPropertySetInfo() finished with state OK
LOG> getPropertySetInfo(): PASSED.OK

LOG> Execute: setPropertyValues()
LOG> starting required method: getPropertyValues()
LOG> Execute: getPropertyValues()
LOG> starting required method: getPropertySetInfo()
Method getPropertyValues() finished with state OK
LOG> getPropertyValues(): PASSED.OK

LOG> Changing all properties
Method setPropertyValues() finished with state OK
LOG> setPropertyValues(): PASSED.OK

LOG> Execute: addPropertiesChangeListener()
LOG> starting required method: getPropertyValues()
make[1]: *** [/fast/core/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/JunitTest/forms_unoapi/done]
Error 1

The log was not sent because I Ctrl-C the tinderbox itself, so it had
no chance to send an email


> Did you already experience builds hung in make check earlier?  I was not
> aware of that.
make check trigger make dev-install which trigger smoketest... which
had been hanging, untile mmeeks added a timeout

> What would be helpful in such a case would be an overview of running
> processes, together with stacks from the suspects (cppunittester,
> soffice.bin).

This is a tinderbox. It is meant to run un-attended for long period of
time (for instance I am expecting it to survive on its own while I'm
at LOConf in Paris). What-ever diagnostic is needed must be collected
automatically.

> > so clearly running make check is not ready for prime time. I'm turning
> > that off on my box for now.
>
> So, looks like I need to set up my own tinderbox?  Hm.

The more the merrier :-)

Norbert