Re: [Libreoffice] [PUSHED][PATCH][REVIEW 3-4] Fix for fdo#38391

2011/9/21 Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com>:
> Isn't it a good thing that the previous range isn't the one selected
> anymore  when an invalid range has been entered ?

Maybe it is. But other apps have different behavior on processing invalid
range.

See results of my small test (in normal mode) for docs with 20 pages:

Range          Draw&Impress   Calc    Writer

<empty>        No pages (!)   1-20    1-20
1-5            1-5            1-5     1-5
q1-5           1-5  (!)       1-5     No pages
qq1-5          1-20 (!!!)     1-20    No pages
qqq1-5         1    (???)     1       No pages
qqqq1-5        1-16 (???)     1-16    No pages
........
qqqqqqqqqq1-5  1-5  (!)       1-5     No pages

If we consider Writer's behavior as standard, should we adjust behavior of
other apps?