On Tuesday 09 of August 2011, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On Aug 9, 2011, at 3:02 PM, Lubos Lunak wrote:
Too bad usage of STL drags in these problems, but that's not a problem
that couldn't be solved.
How?
namespace lostd // or just no namespace at all, any other 'list' class is
unlikely
{
template< ... >
class list : public ::std::list< ... >
{
...
int size() const { return ::std::list< ... >::size(); } // plus possibly
checks here, but somehow doubt there are many cases, if any, where one would
have a list with more than 2E9 items
...
};
This class is technically still also std::list, so it should be a drop-in
replacement for all cases. And IMO a much nicer solution than
people "randomly" adding casts all over the codebase.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lunak@suse.cz
Context
- Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] Replace SvULongs with vector and code clean up part 1 (continued)
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.