Hi Norbert, *,
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 2:46 AM, Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Christian Lohmaier
<lohmaier+libreoffice@googlemail.com> wrote:
if it's already an alias for ccache, it won't be prefixed with an
additional "ccace"
[...]
I'm not sure I'm following: are you talking of the case where someone,
on MacOS, has set-up ccache to masquerade as the compiler ?
I was using your words..
I'm talking about having setup ccache using symlinks.
gcc → ccache
g++ → ccache
gcc-4.0.1 → ccache
[...]
And having those in a PATH that comes before actual compiler.
It just doesn't make much sense to do magic with CC (i.e check whether
it is ccache driven or not) and then later set CC to a completely
different compiler. This is the part that is/was MacOS specific. You
changed the order of the blocks, so thanks for that :-)
ciao
Christian
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.