Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:08:50PM +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 17:37 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Sure, still I think we should keep commits on master and only
cherrypick back to release. 

I'm a fan of this as well FWIW, its what I do by default on all the
various projects I work on, push to master, backport back.

Let me add a +1 here

Like Caolán, this is most of the projects I work on manage their
trunk/stable branches.

This way we can be sure -master as all the bleeding edge stuff and fixes
and the stable release branch only relevant fixes or limited feature ports.
No need to do expensive release branch -> master merges.

-- 
Francois Tigeot

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.