On 11/04/11 15:55, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Noel Power wrote:
As far as I understand the code it consists merely of test calls
to functions in order to see if they return a valid result. I'm
quite sure that you already know whether it has side effects or
not... I vote for "it hasn't", but I'm absolutely not sure
nah, just seems like some testing to see if uno is bootstrapped and
the ucp stuff available, it looks to me especially in the case you
removed to be completely useless.
Btw if you are feeling frisky and wish to kill other related pieces
of uselessness :-) there are the #ifdef _USE_UNO associated blocks
that you can see around the hasUno() method ( and others ) that need
some removing ( afaics _USE_UNO is defined always )
So we're safe to apply the original patch (with the improvements
suggested previously)?
I'm pretty sure Christina pushed the patch to do with the
_OLD_FILE_IMPL IIRC Christina was going to squash the _USE_UNO pieces
too, not sure if that happened yet or not, Christina did you get a
chance to do that or should we maybe add it as an easy hack if you
didn't have time?
Thanks,
Noel
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.