[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Initial icon design [was: Product Artwork]

Hi Ivan, Bernhard, all!

Am Montag, den 29.11.2010, 00:10 +1300 schrieb Ivan M.:
> Hi Bernhard, Christoph, all,
> This is a little late, but when putting things into practice, small
> details come up.

Isn't that usual? ;-)

> First, the good part: I managed to get some headway in Inkscape and
> create basic designs for 16x16 and 32x32 document icons that are
> pixel-perfect (the preview image doesn't show this) [1].

Cool, thanks!

> They're missing the application icons
> [...]
> I'll leave that for someone more skilled. [in Inkscape]

Hey, I'm more than happy that you changed the tool in order to improve
our collaboration :-) And, I think there will be some more minor
iterations, so the application icons might wait (a second, or two).

> Now, the ambiguous part: working with the color pallet at [2], I found
> some small points of possible improvement. [...]

> That doesn't mean I propose we use these colors, but
> rather that we make small adjustments to the existing color table. It
> would be ideal if we could use the same corresponding colors from each
> set of colors (i.e. use Blue 1 for the Writer icon where Green 1 is
> used in the Calc icon...)

Yep, of course. Although I did some designs in advance, I noticed this
for the icons as well. Although I had hoped to have some final colors to
enable the guys who (might have started) the marketing material, slight
changes might be possible.

Now the good message from my side: Since we do have this weird Calc
table [1] for creating the palettes, the is not that much hazzle.

> I will comment on Bernhard's design tomorrow - hopefully what I just
> wrote makes some sense :)

Well, I also added some icons to the wiki - to be viewed in Inkscape,
please. Although there are pixel-perfect, the remaining stuff is more
pixel than perfect (color gradient issues, unnecessarily stacked
objects, ...). Personally, I still don't like them that much, but it
should work.

Since some of us talked about to keep the "TDF Document Symbol" as clean
as possible, I went back to use the old metaphor with the "dog-ear"
edge. Okay, here they are: [2].

Some organizational stuff ... Today, I've asked concerning the MIME type
icons for the LibO 3.3 release within the SC phone conference [3].
Although we need to wait a bit longer for the minutes, here is the
(hopefully) essential information:
* Technically, a release is possible at the end of December, but
people think that this might not be the best time (Christmas),
thus early January will be targeted.
* Changing the icons is possible and the chance for introducing
"regressions" seems rather low. But, ...
* People might have started to create marketing material
(screenshots etc.). Thus, they might rely on a stable version
that does not change during the next weeks.

Thus, the changes are not that bad, or?

Personally, I do think that a visually pleasing and consistent release
might be more important than some screenshots that might differ a bit.

So, what if we want to work on that? I had a look at the OOo pages
concerning the ODF icons. They do have a good document covering the file
types and the icons [4] - I hope that helps to ensure completeness on
our side.

Bernhard, Ivan, all! Thanks for your great work to make LibO 3.3 not
only an unique, but a truly great release ;-)


[1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding#Resources_3




Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

[libreoffice-design] Roadmap - More structure, please!"Ivan M." <ivanm@patentpending.co.nz>
Re: [libreoffice-design] Roadmap - More structure, please!Christoph Noack <christoph@dogmatux.com>
Re: [libreoffice-design] Roadmap - More structure, please!Bernhard Dippold <bernhard@familie-dippold.at>
Re: [libreoffice-design] Roadmap - More structure, please!"Ivan M." <ivanm@patentpending.co.nz>
Product Artwork (was: Re: [libreoffice-design] Roadmap - More structure, please!)Christoph Noack <christoph@dogmatux.com>
Re: Product Artwork (was: Re: [libreoffice-design] Roadmap - More structure, please!)Thorsten Behrens <thb@documentfoundation.org>
Re: Product Artwork (was: Re: [libreoffice-design] Roadmap - More structure, please!)"Ivan M." <ivanm@patentpending.co.nz>
[libreoffice-design] Re: Initial icon design [was: Product Artwork]Bernhard Dippold <bernhard@familie-dippold.at>
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Initial icon design [was: Product Artwork]Christoph Noack <christoph@dogmatux.com>
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Initial icon design [was: Product Artwork]Bernhard Dippold <bernhard@familie-dippold.at>
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Initial icon design [was: Product Artwork]"Ivan M." <ivanm@patentpending.co.nz>
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Initial icon design [was: Product Artwork]Bernhard Dippold <bernhard@familie-dippold.at>
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Initial icon design [was: Product Artwork]"Ivan M." <ivanm@patentpending.co.nz>
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Initial icon design [was: Product Artwork]Bernhard Dippold <bernhard@familie-dippold.at>
Re: [libreoffice-design] Re: Initial icon design [was: Product Artwork]"Ivan M." <ivanm@patentpending.co.nz>
Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.