Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2024 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Eyal,

I was wondering when you would turn your focus to the developer list. I have been watching your 
posts on the board discussion mailing list and, frankly, I still have no idea what you do except 
complain about literally everything.

Look man, I’ve been working with the LibreOffice (and its predecessor  OpenOffice) for 20+ years 
and I’ve seen a parade of pushy people like you swoop in, tell us we all suck, and then demand we 
all conform to your wishes. To quote Michael Meeks, you are good at identifying problems but very 
poor at resolving any of them.

There are a thousand or more things I’d like to improve. But here’s the deal:  TDF doesn’t actually 
have any developers. Heiko doesn’t have an army of developers waiting for your insight. He relies 
on volunteers like me to figure out what can change without pissing users off. Problem is that 
volunteers like me don’t really like dealing wth overbearing people like you.

I admire Heiko’s patience and professionalism. He’s in a difficult spot with zero funding. I get 
it, shouting and belittling TDF staff is your way of trying t get people to do what you want. But, 
like most users, you provide absolutely nothing to hire the staff that you really want. I for one 
have decided that I just don’t like you and will ensure that I never work on your wants in the 
future. 

Patrick

On Aug 8, 2024, at 5:42 PM, Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz1@gmx.com> wrote:

Come on, Heiko and Cor! Another example of not giving proper attention
to the discussion on the bug page.

On 08/08/2024 16:36, Heiko Tietze wrote:
 * "Text direction" in page style dialog, with both Asian and RTL-CTL,
    is inconsistent and confusing

you left out a key part of the title: "doesn't always set the actual
direction".

    + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162200
    + agree with Regina on keep status but write better help (Cor)
    => WF
 * Table > Properties > Text Flow > Text Orientation is misphrased and
confusing
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162201
   + better "writing mode" (Regina)
 => follow the expert's advice

First, let us return to a point that I thought was already settled:
Changes to help/documentation text are not a solution for problems with
the LibreOffice UI. If a control or a label is confusing or
inconsistent, that needs to be improved in the app itself, as best we
can; and whatever the UI has - the documentation is for elaboration in
greater detail, with more context and examples.

Second, we're past confusion or poor wording: We have "Text Direction"
control, which, for vertical writing modes - does not set the text
direction (!) and - there isn't another control in the dialog which sets
it, either. (For horizontal writing modes, the control does set the
direction.)

Finally - there are concrete suggestions for some improvements, and
they are not even all dependent on each other. The design meeting
minutes do not list any argument regarding why any of them are a bad
idea (and Regina's comments do not argue against these suggestions either).

Let me rephrase the suggested changes briefly, here:

* Split off writing mode control from direction control, using
consistent and clearly-phrased labels.

* Improve the preview graph to illustrate how lines look and progress.


Eyal




 * STYLES pane -- duplicate style (an additional option beside the
existing
   new style from selection
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162209
   + WF'ed before on bug 152189
   + duplication would be like new but on the same level in the hierarchy,
     support the request (Cor)
   => do it

 * Terrible usability of AutoText dialog when creating new AutoText
   + https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52607
   + Source > Clipboard (added newly) should not be done as the AT
     needs to be verified in the context (Cor)
   + preview window: zoom slider for preview (Gerry)
     + disagree; the actual issue should be fixed (Heiko)
   + AutoText dialog should be amodal
     + agreed (Cor, Heiko)
   + does it make sense to modify the category while creating a new AT
(Cor)
     + we should carefully avoid mixing individual attributes from one AT
       with information on the list of ATs such as categories and path;
       therefore these are split out of the AT dialog/s (Heiko)
   + is "Create AutoText out of selection" (directly) possible? (Gerry)
     + requires a category and unless we just add all new content to
       some "Standard" it needs this selection first (Heiko)
   => wait for volunteers to implement



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.