Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi all,
seems to be a very aggressive title?
My personal impressions are that the design team is loosing the sight for graphical elements, and only works on user experience.
Let me tell what happened the last weeks:
1. Taking *all* VI from whiteboard list to playground list.
2. Talking about, that it isn't the design team's job for working on T-Shirts or other marketing material 3. Taking off all Playground lists. Where is the discussion to do this? So there is no way to find any work for visual identity.
4. There were no dialogs about buttons, banners, conference material etc.

I know that some of you aren't work on VI but there is a huge call for banners, web buttons etc. Especially for 4.0. And that isn't the marketing team's job. It seems that I'm the only one working for this and this isn't good because I haven't the skills to do such things for 4.0.

When we do a review we should do a view too:
I have a simple problem with the whole design working process. The focus of all who worked here for the last year was only on [UX]. We have no [VI] in work. We don't give the marketing what they urgently need [2]. We as Design team didn't work on any stuff for the next Conference.

Look and compare the Whiteboards and the Playgrounds to get a feeling about it. Marketing material is in Playground, no working point in Whiteboard.

Maybe my words are a bit hard. I thought about all of it the last weeks.
Then two questions appear to me and I gave them a name:

1 Nik as a great designer for the stuff here who was away for a longer time comes along and asks this question: Nik's question: "What stuff can I do for you now to get a really good movement in your design? Only one because I have no time to work on many things." What would we say?

2 Bernhard had the experience to get the stuff in a well-structured order, so the people can find and work with it easily. Bernhard's question: "Where can I find the material to work on next?" Let's have a look: "Wiki - Design - ? Aaah Whiteboard, but there is only UX and no graphical design. So they need no graphical design?"

Let's do our next work with these two questions.

The marketing team starts a discussion about their strategy [3] and of course there are some critics even the design team is concerned [4]. Do we get them? Do we work on it? If we don't do this the others made it for themselves without us.

And we should do this too: Defining a strategy for design [VI] and [UX].

------ maybe an own discussion but part of strategy
I don't think that the voting about the new design in 3.6 happened in a really good way no matter what happened with the announcement. We should not vote by Google+ or even by IRC. Especially not for the design which concerns to our presentation. Google+ can show us some direction, and IRC is not my/our tool for community and communication (I e.g. am not able to join these IRCs). There was no official discussion about the proposals here on the ml (or I missed it). And lack of time isn't an excuse for it. We need a time plan for such work. So I hope we can do it for 4 in a better way. Maybe we need a release plan.
------

[1] http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Visual_Elements
[2] http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Buttons-Creating-Improving-LibreOffice-web-banners-buttons-for-external-website-use-td3965958.html
[3] http://go.mail-archive.com/RKmdltCSiTUjAQdRekKqjvz1eXc=
[4] http://go.mail-archive.com/edAtdbnJUBihTPviowGLB3sxoKc=


Ok, that was many stuff for you, so I close here and I'm going back to work.


--
Grüße
k-j

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.