Hi Andrew, all,
first of all thanks for the positive replies towards user-testing of the
icons. I think only Andrew was negativ about it, so I would like to answer his
mail in detail:
Am Freitag, 6. April 2012, 11:31:53 schrieb Andrew Pullins:
I don't like the idea of letting the users test the icons. There are many
things that the users can test that would benifit us, but the disign of
things is not one of them. If they have something that they would like to
be different then they can join the team, or find a way to help.
Testing icons does not mean let the users design them. I agree that users are
not the right people for designing icons. I was referring to the discussion of
using 'a' or 'A' or 'i' or whatever. My advice would be to design all possible
icons and see which work best for different users with different cultural
background.
I think we
would work on making the icons look relitivly the same. As though they were
made by one artist, and not by eight.
Agree on that. Otherwise we would not talk about an icon 'set'.
Besides I don't think that user really care what we make as long as we
revamp the crap that we have now.
Perhaps you should try to find some more careful words here. If you think LO
or parts are 'crap' you should perhaps keep that to yourself. It is not
encouraging for anyone who has been involved in the past and did the best
possible in the given circumstances, if anything in this context is called
'crap'. Times and fashion has changed and it is good to keep every part of LO
up-to-date, including the icons.If this is what you mean - I would agree to
it.
If you go back and read the comments to
the OMG!Ububtu article about the Citrus UI [1] you will see that all the
users loved the UI, and that they could not stand our new one.
If you want you can get there opinion of all the icons together once we
have them done.
The normal user (aka the vast majority) does not read nor comment on
OMG!Ubuntu. So I would be careful about any generalization based on comments
on a(ny) webpage. Please be aware that we have (probably hundereds of)
millions of users in LO varying in technical, cultural, social and every other
persepctive you can even think about. So getting a good feedback from these is
a non-trivial task. And in any case not beeing done by publishing on
OMG!Ubuntu.
But most users don't enven care as long as we make it look
pritty. My friend does not even care about that, she is fine with it the
way it is. zshe just likes it because its free, and she can write docs for
school.
See, you are disagreeing with the 'crap'-thing yourself. If it is working, it
cannot be crap. And if it is working we need to be very careful to actually
improve things. Not everything new is automatically better as well.
Summing it up: Do not take the integration into teams too easily. Next to the
obvious teams, like developers, translation or marketing, it should be our job
here to not loose the user-team, but to strongly integrate it into the
development. So again: I am not going to do it myself, but I am willing to
support anyone who really wants to go the way to involve users into the LO
development. Simply ping me :)
Happy easter!
Björn
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
[libreoffice-design] Re: Bold and Italic icons · ape
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.