Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index



If I understand you correctly, you are proposing to keep "Print Layout" how it is and instead add a 
new view-layout called "Draft Layout." And this "Draft Layout" would merge the ends and beginnings 
of pages together like the pic I uploaded to imgur illustrates?
If I understand this correctly, the "Draft Layout" sounds like a great solution. But I would kindly 
suggest adding a setting that lets users set "Draft Layout" as the default layout that Writer 
displays when it is opened. So when I open Writer to begin a document, "Draft Layout" is the view 
that is selected by default. I would have to manually change it if I wanted "Print Layout" or "Web 
Layout". Does this make sense?

Subject: RE: [libreoffice-design] merge Print Layout pages
From: christoph@dogmatux.com
To: design@global.libreoffice.org
Date: Sat, 9 Jul 2011 15:39:37 +0200

Hi all,

just a short comment, since I once analyzed some of the today available
views in Writer (during the OOo UX times). I think that the enhancement
request is just a "half-way" solution that just adds some more
complexity to Writer without solving the real issue.

For example, even Microsoft changed the behavior from 2003 to 2007 and
made this feature "more hidden". I assume they wanted to completely
remove it, but feared the feedback by the existing user base.

My take: The enhancement request should target a real "Draft" view,
which considers page breaks and the width of the real pages without
showing the borders etc. This would also solve a lot of other issues in
this area ... not only one. But, this is really tough work - I omit all
the details, but I talked with one of the Devs during the FOSDEM and I
got some introduction in the internal issues of the Writer structure
(there, we talked about an outline view).

Do you agree somehow? If yes, I'd like to rewrite the enhancement
request.

Cheers,
Christoph


Am Freitag, den 08.07.2011, 17:26 -0400 schrieb nick rundy:
thanks Sigrid
here's my enhancement request:  https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39080

Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 23:05:17 +0200
From: sigrid.carrera@googlemail.com
To: design@global.libreoffice.org
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-design] merge Print Layout pages

Hi Nick, 

On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 16:46:03 -0400
nick rundy <nrundy@hotmail.com> wrote:


can you please provide the link to the bugzilla specific site that deals with LibreOffice? 
I will create my own bug. Thanks

Sure, you'll find bugzilla here: 
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/

You need to select LibreOffice as product. This bugzilla is shared between many different 
projects. 

HTH
Sigrid

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

                                      



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
                                          
-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.