Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


+1 to Bernhard.
Now that that's out of the way, I request you to please consider Phil's proposal. I think that almost all (if not all) the steps he mentioned are being followed now too, just in a unorganized way. I believe that bringing a organized and managed scheme for new ideas and conveying it to the people involved in a clear manner will tidy up and improve the productivity of the entire process.

Thanks,
Vamsi.

On 05/25/2011 04:59 PM, Phil Jackson wrote:
Hi Bernhard

We need some structure and therefore we need someone unofficially or officially to lead it. I'm more than happy for you to take on that role.

If possible, I'd like to see a degree of formalisation of how the design team will work together with suggestions of stages for taking an idea and transforming it into a form that we have agreement on for submission to the pool of programmers.

This is about building relationships between the design team members but also between the design team and programmers so they feel part of the design team.

It's like selling ideas to management - well articulated ideas with supporting evidence should make a difference in getting done what the Design Team thinks by consensus is necessary to improve the product.

Here are some suggestions for stages;

1) Someone comes up with an idea
2) Idea is posted on Design/WhiteBoards and emailed to team members
3) Idea is discussed and debated with ample opportunity to test idea and gather arguments for and against 4) Goes to vote stage by design members after member proposes that they do this - if passed goes to Stage 5) 5) A Design/Whiteboards paper for the idea if constructed giving a formalised breakdown of the idea - i.e. Overview, Introduction, Main Body with evidence, conclusions (why idea is a good one) and references/bibliography.
6) Submitted to programmers pool for their feedback.
7) Followup

We need to make this reasonably professional without turning it into a Phd. It makes it transparent for all.

I know that some of these things are already done, but using a system will make it more likely that progress is seen to be made on some very interesting and beneficial ideas.

What does everybody think?

Cheers

Phil Jackson


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.