Le 2011-04-25 06:57, Michel RENON a écrit :
Hi,
As a LibreOffice user, I feel changes are too slow... ;-)
So, beside the current organisation of UX group, I asked myself if it be
possible to work on urgent/easy items ?
The idea would be to (try to) resolve some UI/UX problems in LibreOffice
3.5 (and 3.6 ?). The short delay impose a light process of UI/UX
validation.
It would be UI/UX problems/enhancements that are :
- easy to develop : move/rename items, change default values, simplify,
make obvious...
- won't have too much impact in the future : no problem if LibreOffice
3.7 or 4.x or 5.x changes again
And from a non-technical point of view, it would send a signal to all
users : "LibreOffice is really changing !"
There is already a proposal list fo GSOC 2011:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Gsoc/Ideas#UI_cleanup
To add some ideas, we can make a kind of survey ? or we use only our own
experience ? I have my own list ;-)
(Or do I just have to add my list of requests/bugs in bugzilla ?)
Do you think it's a pertinent idea ?
Michel
+1
I have been following the developer mailing list and they follow this
principle with success. They seem to be making quite remarkable headway.
Their list has "entry level" type development items that are great for
new devs involvement.
Marc
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.