Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Le 2011-02-10 07:23, David Nelson a écrit :
Hi, :-)

When it's not possible to establish definite licensing for a template,
does that perhaps suggest that either there was never any formal
licensing or that we couldn't really be blamed much for further
distributing it?

Also, many of the templates we might accumulate would probably undergo
some additional development/maintenance work, and might even end up a
bit unrecognizable...

I do understand your praiseworthy concerns, Marc, but I'm wondering if
you're not being a *little* over-cautious?

What do others think?

David Nelson

I just think we should be a little cautious if we are going to migrate some templates from a competitor's site to ours. The gentle warning did also come from one of our members who is in the legal field as well.

I also agree with you as far as implicating the documentation team. Some of the templates I saw are in dire need of "sprucing" up. They show their age through their documentation, however, their usefulness are still warranted.


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.